Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Rachael B's avatar

My second-ever job out of university required me to take a 'personality test' (not sure if it was MBTI exactly but it had a lot in common) as part of the screening - this was in 1999. The final hurdle in the process was an interview with the CEO, during which he discussed my results with me. I still think that what I said to him then holds true now: the results of these tests are strongly influenced by the context a person is operating in when they're taking them - not just in the test room, but in their day-to-day outside of that. A large chunk of people don't fall into that white-hot self-referential group that are broadly the same whatever they do, but are adaptable to what their team or colleagues need (within limits).

(Mine said something about me having a problem with authority. At the time, I was under a completely toxic supervisor who policed every minute of my working day, micro-managed my work and took every chance she could to reprimand me in a hyper-critical rather than constructive fashion. HELL YES I had a problem with authority. And *everyone* who knows me now would laugh themselves silly to hear me described that way.)

Expand full comment
Amy Winder's avatar

@Bruce Daisley having sent a reply I would really be interested to hear from the supporters of tests/MBTI as to whether the tests accurately ‘catch’ unsavoury people (I gave an example of a former boss who would belch in my face, touch colleagues inappropriately and make demeaning/sexualised comments). From memory, he took one of those tests and it didn’t mention any of these traits. I’d much rather know about what he as actually like instead of how ‘extroverted’ he was.

I wonder if anyone using it for dating has a tale to tell!

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts